A video of this talk will be available in due course. Please check back on 26th March for details.
Date: Thursday 26th March 2020
Time: 12-1pm
Room: BG09A, Building 9
Dr Rob King (University College Cork)
Abstract:
Mass killings are unusual events but devastating when they occur.
Although the absolute risk of dying at the hands of such a killer are low,
people stubbornly refuse statisticians’ earnest assurances of relative safety.
This should not surprise us. Mass killings are, among many other things, a
deliberate attempt to drive a wedge into the existing social order. That is why
they are public, and why the killer seeks to maximise attention.
Attention to our evolved natures can cast some light on this. Men swim in
worlds of status, like trout swim in complex currents of water. Said status is
exquisitely linked to male reproductive success, and males who were blind to
its ups and downs have simply not had descendants.
Here we report on two studies into spree killings in the USA. In the
first we carried out an archival study of mass killers. Latent class analysis
revealed a highly bimodal distribution.
The younger group (average age 23) tended to have been in trouble with
the law, they were more likely to have had mental illness. In other words—at
the age where young men are acquiring status, and the skills and abilities that
will enable them to do so—they were, in fact, acquiring signs that they were on
a fast track to reproductive oblivion. In ancestral times—times without highly
trained and equipped SWAT teams--a “Hail Mary” attempt to attract attention and
make ‘them’ take you seriously might—just might, have worked.
The older group (average age 41) were much more likely to be married,
and maybe have families. They were less likely to have had prior signs of legal
issues nor of mental illness. But a peak into their personal details (so far as
we were able) revealed that they had a pattern of recent status loss. These
older guys were not so much trying to acquire status, their actions looked more
like a highly pathological attempt to not lose it. They were more likely to die
during the spree, through suicide or “suicide by cop”.
Ogas and Gaddam (2012) note “It turns out that killing people is an
effective way to elicit the attention of many women: virtually every serial
killer, including Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, and David Berkowitz, has received
love letters from large numbers of female fans” (p. 98).
The most toxic of masculinity does not put off
all possible sexual partners. The existence of the first type of spree killer
implies a female audience. In our second study we found part of this audience
online. They are a conscious subset of hybristophiles who actively
distinguish themselves from run of the mill celebrity, or even spree killer
followers, by showing a desire to join in, or have open sexual ambitions
towards the killers. Sometimes they manage to meet and marry them in
prison.
~
This talk is aimed at anyone interested in psychology, particularly forensic
psychology and criminology.
Students
are encouraged to attend.
Attendance
would benefit both undergraduate
and postgraduate students from psychology
and related fields ~
|
Biography:
I am an
early career researcher with interests in biological psychology, behavioral
ecology, and philosophy of mind. I have
published and consulted in areas pertaining to human sexual behavior and
regularly review for Journal of Sexual Medicine, Archives of Sexual Behavior
and Journal of Evolutionary Psychology.
I completed my PhD with Jay Belsky, studying fertility-related aspects of female sexual response -work which I am continuing and hoping to turn into a book.
No comments:
Post a Comment